Credit: JaRiRiyawat/Adobe Stock
In a new legal filing, former NCUA Board Members Todd Harper and Tanya Otsuka cited a recent federal court decision to bolster their argument that their removals by President Donald Trump were unconstitutional.
The filing, submitted June 16 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, referenced a ruling from the District of Maryland in Mary Boyle v. Donald J. Trump, where a federal judge reinstated members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). The court found no separation-of-powers violation in the CPSC’s structure, even though it exercises law enforcement authority, because its actions must be approved by the U.S. Attorney General, who remains accountable to the president.
Recommended For You
Harper and Otsuka’s attorneys argued that the same reasoning applies to the NCUA. Unlike agencies such as the Federal Reserve or FDIC, the NCUA lacks independent litigation authority and must rely on the Department of Justice to pursue enforcement actions. This connection to the executive branch, they said, undermines Trump’s claim that their statutory removal protections infringed on presidential power.
The NCUA Board cannot appear in court or enforce penalties without the consent of the Attorney General, the filing argued, citing both legal precedent and statutory limitations.
The supplemental authority aims to reinforce the plaintiffs’ position that their term-limited, Senate-confirmed roles are protected from arbitrary dismissal and that their ouster violates constitutional norms.
The case remains under review by Judge Amir H. Ali.
© Touchpoint Markets, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more inforrmation visit Asset & Logo Licensing.