Credit unions, pay attention: The CFPB's very existence may violate the U.S. Constitution.
A U.S. Court of Appeals did not quite declare the CFPB unconstitutional, but in an April 12 hearing challenging a CFPB penalty leveled at PHH Mortgage, the court engaged in a line of questions that cast doubts on the constitutional basis for the CFPB. This not only surprised many observers but sets up a potentially explosive ruling that could significantly pare back the CFPB's presence and authority in the regulatory arena.
To review the bidding: Mortgage service provider PHH challenged a June 2015 CFPB decision calling for the disgorgement of $109 million in revenue earned when the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development had jurisdiction over mortgage servicing activity under RESPA. PHH appealed this order, directly questioned the right of the CFPB to retroactively undo what had been previously legitimate business activity, and most significantly, disputed the constitutional validity of the CFPB.
Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.
Your access to unlimited CUTimes.com content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- Critical CUTimes.com information including comprehensive product and service provider listings via the Marketplace Directory, CU Careers, resources from industry leaders, webcasts, and breaking news, analysis and more with our informative Newsletters.
- Exclusive discounts on ALM and CU Times events.
- Access to other award-winning ALM websites including Law.com and GlobeSt.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
