A House Financial Services Committee is scheduled Wednesday tomark up H.R. 4367, the bill that would repeal the ATM placardrequirement on fee disclosures under the Electronic Funds TransferAct, which has spurred frivolouslawsuits against credit unions.

|

If cleared by the committee, the bill would proceed next to theHouse floor for action.

|

In a letter Monday to panel Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.) andRanking Member Barney Frank (D-Mass.), Dan Berger, NAFCU executivevice president of government affairs, said the placard requirementmay have had its use when it was first implemented in the 1990s,but there is no need for it today.

|

ATM users can review on screen any fee about to be assessed, andhave the opportunity to cancel their transactions, he said.

|

Under current law, an ATM owner is open to possible class actionlawsuits if a placard has been removed or vandalized; damage awardscan go as high as $500,000 plus attorneys' fees and costs.

|

“This statutorily prescribed bounty has created a strongincentive for spurious lawsuits,” Berger said.

|

H.R. 4367, introduced by Reps. Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-Mo.) andDavid Scott (D-Ga.), has 127 cosponsors. A similar Senate measure,S. 3204, has 17 cosponsors.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical CUTimes.com information including comprehensive product and service provider listings via the Marketplace Directory, CU Careers, resources from industry leaders, webcasts, and breaking news, analysis and more with our informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and CU Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including Law.com and GlobeSt.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.