X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

I didn’t watch the proceedings of the 30-year anniversary hearing of the Community Reinvestment Act, but stories recounted to me were mixed with regard to credit unions’ treatment. With no credit union witnesses on any of the panels, the banking trades and even the Connecticut regulator were free to suggest that credit unions should be subject to CRA at the federal level.

True, most credit unions don’t have direct experience with CRA, but the opportunity for the bankers was obvious; a credit union representative should have been there to make the case that the credit unions are already doing more for their members than the banks do under CRA. And, if the hearing was intended to be truly commemorative in nature, it should have been kept on point. If credit unions weren’t testifying because they had no experience with CRA, then their lack of CRA coverage should not have become a recurring topic of discussion at what was meant to be a “look back” over the years.

 

Credit Union Times

Join Credit Union Times

Don’t miss crucial strategic and tactical information necessary to run your institution and better serve your members. Join Credit Union Times now!

  • Free unlimited access to Credit Union Times' trusted and independent team of experts for extensive industry news, conference coverage, people features, statistical analysis, and regulation and technology updates.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and Credit Union Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including TreasuryandRisk.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join Credit Union Times
Live Chat

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.