X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Editor-in-Chief Paul Gentile’s Feb. 22 column on NCUA’s data collection program repeatedly references “serving the underserved.” My challenge is, I don’t know what “serving the underserved” means – it’s vague, has no legal basis that I’m aware of, and smacks of euphemism. I would suggest as an industry we should drop the term from our lexicon. “Serving people of modest means” is our congressional mandate, as expressed in the Federal Credit Union Act. Rather than letting bankers define who we should serve, let’s determine as best we can, what our original mandate meant, in the context of the world of 1934. Then let’s translate that meaning into today’s economic terms, to set a reasonable standard of what our mandate means today. Who exactly did credit unions serve in 1934? Wasn’t it largely employed factory workers? What do employed factory workers earn today? Are those factory workers at the same income levels as described by “serving the underserved”? (I suspect not, but I’ll admit it’s only a suspicion, since again, I don’t know what “serving the underserved” really means). Is it OK today for credit unions to serve teachers, policemen and firemen? Or do those groups make too much money? (Surely not!) How about white-collar government workers? How about military officers? We all know that this vague term “serving the underserved” has something to do with serving “the poor.” I certainly believe credit unions are in a great position to assist in serving “the poor” (however you define the term). But was it ever the intent for credit unions, that we should exclude middle class Americans? For any legislators who might believe serving employed middle class Americans is outside of our mandate, have they thought through the fact that if credit unions did serve exclusively “the poor”, we would not have the resources to serve our poorest members nearly as well as we do today? I agree with Gentile that this issue is not going away, but we need to figure out what our industry’s mandate really is, rather than allowing our enemies to define our mandate for us. And yes, then we should gather data to validate how well we are meeting that mandate. Martin Breland Tower Federal Credit Union CEO Annapolis Junction, Md.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited CUTimes.com content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Critical CUTimes.com information including comprehensive product and service provider listings via the Marketplace Directory, CU Careers, resources from industry leaders, webcasts, and breaking news, analysis and more with our informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and CU Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including Law.com and GlobeSt.com.

Already have an account?

 

Credit Union Times

Join Credit Union Times

Don’t miss crucial strategic and tactical information necessary to run your institution and better serve your members. Join Credit Union Times now!

  • Free unlimited access to Credit Union Times' trusted and independent team of experts for extensive industry news, conference coverage, people features, statistical analysis, and regulation and technology updates.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and Credit Union Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including TreasuryandRisk.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join Credit Union Times
Live Chat

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.