During yesterday's beginning of the House debate on the bill that would revamp the way financial services are regulated, Democrats argued that the measure was necessary to prevent another economic meltdown while Republicans said it would cause job losses and limit consumer choice.
But the real action was off the House floor where moderate Democrats delayed action for several hours and forced member of the House leadership to consider some of their amendments to the bill.
The moderates threatened to withhold support for the measure and succeeded in gaining certain concessions. These included a promise from the leadership that there will be votes on an amendment by Rep. Melissa Bean (D-Ill.) to allow national banks to be exempt from state rules and on amendment by Rep. Walt Minnick (D-Idaho) to replace the proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency with a council made up of the heads of regulatory agencies.
Recommended For You
The wrangling within the Democratic Party caused the House Rules Committee to delay until this morning its discussion of which of the more than 200 proposed amendments will be allowed to be offered on the House floor.
The House is expected to resume consideration of the measure later today, once it completes action on other legislation.
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.