Looking back eight years ago finds credit unions' community involvement questioned at a House subcommittee hearing.

CUNA and NAFCU argued the need for credit unions to have a CRA-exemption. Lobbyists in Washington questioned whether the no-room-for-negotiations strategy employed by both CUNA and NAFCU would work.

"I don't understand it," said one lobbyist, who requested anonymity. "If CUNA and NAFCU would come in here and do something like try to craft a CRA- type obligation for credit unions under current law, perhaps with a small credit union exemption, Congress would applaud loud and long. But," he sighed, "they're going to get themselves bloodied if they keep summarily dismissing the need for them to be legally required to reinvest in their communities. Many of these congressional members don't like bullies."

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical CUTimes.com information including comprehensive product and service provider listings via the Marketplace Directory, CU Careers, resources from industry leaders, webcasts, and breaking news, analysis and more with our informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and CU Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including Law.com and GlobeSt.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.