SACRAMENTO – A coalition of NAFCU, CUNA, several banking associations and several national credit card issuers trying to stifle the State of California's pending credit card disclosure law have misunderstood a routine administrative opinion, according to briefs filed by the state in the case. The opinion has no relevance to the state's position on the law, it argued. The opinion, developed by the state's banking authority, reportedly argued for the governor vetoing the measure. The coalition asked to see the opinion as part of the discovery process. But the state refused and the plaintiffs have appealed believing that, should the document be entered into the court record, it could substantially support their case. But the state argued in its most recent brief that the document in question is not extraordinary and does not represent the banking department's opinion at the time or currently. "Obviously, we can't be sure what is in the documents until we see them. But it would be interesting to see the grounds on which an agency of the California state government was prepared to attack this legislation," said Eric Richard, CUNA's General Counsel. The court will decide the case December 6.

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical CUTimes.com information including comprehensive product and service provider listings via the Marketplace Directory, CU Careers, resources from industry leaders, webcasts, and breaking news, analysis and more with our informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and CU Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including Law.com and GlobeSt.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.