WASHINGTON-CUNA and NAFCU penned their approval of NCUA's "safe harbor" provision for net worth restoration plans under Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) in recent official comment letters. The proposed plan would permit credit unions marginally below the "adequately capitalized" net worth ratio to use a net worth transfer schedule to meet the net worth restoration plan requirements. The proposal is in anticipation of some credit unions near the 6% cutoff falling slightly below due to the "flight to safety" over the last couple years that has caused liquidity to come pouring into credit unions. "Indeed uninduced growth reflects the fact that members find the credit union a safe, attractive place in which they wish to entrust funds. Instead of corrective action, uninduced growth simply requires sufficient net income to capitalize that growth so that further net worth ratio declines are slowed and reversed," an attachment to CUNA's comment letter read. "Otherwise healthy and well-managed credit unions that become undercapitalized because of uninduced growth need to increase net income sufficiently to restore net worth ratios. However, under PCA they are subjected to the uncertainty of a Net Worth Restoration Plan (NWRP) and potentially face an extensive list of mandatory and discretionary supervisory actions (DSAs), many of which could seriously disrupt the operations of a well-managed, but rapidly growing credit union." CUNA Chief Economist Bill Hampel told reporters last week that approximately 1,200 credit unions are in the 7% to 9% capital range and would be most likely to be in a position to take advantage of the "safe harbor" plan. However, several others with even higher capital levels have also expressed concern. In stark contrast to CUNA's detail, NAFCU invoked the K.I.S.S. theory-Keep It Simple, Stupid. In a brief three paragraph comment letter, NAFCU President and CEO Fred Becker wrote, "NAFCU supports NCUA's proposed revisions and adjustments and believes that the changes strengthen a credit union's ability to comply with the regulations by providing flexibility, clarity and consistency." CUNA's comment letter further suggested NCUA: *

drop the requirement for a regular reserve account; *

increase the threshold for member business loans to 25% rather than the 12.25% from the Federal Credit Union Act, consistent with NCUA's risk assessment for long-term mortgage loans; *

Recommended For You

consider allowing undercapitalized credit unions to use secondary capital "in some contexts" to meet PCA requirements. (While it would not be part of net worth, CUNA noted that its presence could provide a shield for certain undercapitalized credit unions, such as those with no less than 4% net worth.); and *

reconsider scheduling "callable loans" by call date, rather than maturity date to calculate risk-based net worth, or provide a somewhat lower risk weighting for callable loans. CUNA also wrote that NCUA is moving in the proper direction by proposing to reflect loans sold with partial recourse for risk weighting and permitting a credit union to receive a risk mitigation credit prior to failing the RBNW requirement. [email protected]

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.