Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

<p>WASHINGTON-The House Financial Services Committee staff held a meeting January 24 with industry leaders regarding federal deposit insurance reform. Financial Institution Subcommittee Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.) is expected to introduce deposit insurance reform legislation this year. Financial Services majority staff has also been meeting with Senate Banking Committee majority staff on potential legislation, according to NAFCU Director of Legislative and Political Affairs Brad Thaler. So far the committee only had a rough outline worked out to present to the interested parties. Provisions in the possible legislation could include merging the Bank Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund while leaving the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund untouched; increasing coverage to either $110,000, $120,000, or $130,000 with a tendency toward more coverage; indexing coverage according to the Consumer Price Index every 10 years beginning in 2010; doubling coverage for certain retirement accounts; consideration of increasing municipal deposit insurance coverage; and commissioning a study of whether to establish additional, voluntary deposit insurance coverage for higher premiums and the feasibility of complete privatization of insurance coverage. Thaler said the committee staffers considered the latter part of the study an unlikely avenue but wanted to study the possibility. NAFCU said total privatization could be “disastrous,” while CUNA Vice President and Senior Legislative Counsel Gary Kohn said they would like to see the results of the study before weighing in on the privatization issue. Kohn added that the level of coverage might not be the only sticking point. He pointed out that the banking industry was not even unanimous on whether a coverage increase is necessary. The deposit insurance reform bill could move at a fairly quick pace by Washington standards. According to Kohn, the Financial Institutions Subcommittee is looking at marking up the bill by the end of February or beginning of March. The full House Financial Services Committee could then mark it up by the end of March or early April. While Kohn said CUNA did not necessarily want a deposit insurance coverage increase, it would result in a “competitive problem” if banks received it and not credit unions. “Everybody we talked to without exception said that would be an unacceptable situation,” he said. [email protected]</p>

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.

Your access to unlimited CUTimes.com content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:

  • Critical CUTimes.com information including comprehensive product and service provider listings via the Marketplace Directory, CU Careers, resources from industry leaders, webcasts, and breaking news, analysis and more with our informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and CU Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including Law.com and GlobeSt.com.

Already have an account?


Credit Union Times

Join Credit Union Times

Don’t miss crucial strategic and tactical information necessary to run your institution and better serve your members. Join Credit Union Times now!

  • Free unlimited access to Credit Union Times' trusted and independent team of experts for extensive industry news, conference coverage, people features, statistical analysis, and regulation and technology updates.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and Credit Union Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including TreasuryandRisk.com and Law.com.

Already have an account? Sign In Now
Join Credit Union Times
Live Chat

Copyright © 2022 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.