Affinity FCU’s Fenton Urges Lawmakers to Keep 30-Year Mortgage: Onsite Coverage
Calling it a net plus for the consumers and the housing market, Affinity FCU President/CEO John Fenton on Thursday urged lawmakers to ensure that any changes in the housing finance system don’t jeopardize the existence of the 30-year mortgage.
“It’s consumer friendly, straightforward and easy to understand,’’ Fenton said during testimony on housing finance reform before the Senate Banking Committee. “It’s necessary for the health of the housing market that it remain a viable product.’’
Fenton, who testified on behalf of NAFCU, said the way to ensure that that kind of mortgage remains available is to revamp the housing finance system in a way that keeps a strong government presence in the market.
He recommended that even if mortgage buyers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are shut down, the government have two mortgage buyers to ensure competition so that credit unions continue to have access to a viable secondary market.
Fenton, whose Basking Ridge, N.J., credit union has assets of $2 billion, said a strong secondary market allows institutions such as his to avoid keeping too many mortgages on their books and taking on undue risks.
He said that removing government’s role would have a “destabilizing effect,’’ on the market. In response to a question from Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Fenton said that 30-year mortgages aren’t the best option for all of his credit union’s members but they work with them to find the best product.
And Fenton noted that the housing crisis was caused in part by the failure of some other financial institutions to work closely enough with consumers to put them in the best possible mortgage for them.
George Mason University professor Anthony Sanders agreed that the 30-year mortgage is a consumer-friendly product but that is because of a heavy government subsidy. He suggested that consumers might be better served if they had access to more less expensive adjustable rate mortgages.
Sanders also said that 30-year mortgages can be risky for consumers because they don’t account for changes in the economy. And at a time of falling housing prices, having such a mortgage can “put people in a negative equity position very quickly’’
The hearing is one of a series of sessions that the committee has held on aspects of the housing finance system. There are calls for overhauling the system in part because of the financial difficulties of Fannie and Freddie which caused the government to place them into conservatorship.
Both CUNA and NAFCU have weighed in on the future of the housing finance system and supported a continued government presence in it.