A leading consumer activist has called fears that significantnumbers of merchants might begin to surcharge credit card paymentsin order to recoup interchange costs the result of a “PR campaign”from Visa and MasterCard.

|

EdMierzwinski, consumer program director for the U.S. PublicInterest Research Group, wrote in a blog entry that some people have been “snookered” by thecampaign into being afraid that merchants would charge thesurcharge, but added that US PIRG did not believe this wouldhappen.

|

US PIRG doubted this would happen primarily because merchantswould not want to upset their customers, Mierzwinski said.

|

“The threat of surcharging, which would lower credit card use(and therefore bank profits, which the banks wouldn't like) mayhelp merchants negotiate lower swipe fees, but we simply don'tthink many merchants will surcharge their customers,” he wrote inthe Feb. 2 entry. “In addition, 40% of all consumers live in 10large states (California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Kansas,Maine, Massachusetts, New York, Oklahoma and Texas) that prohibitsurcharging by state law. The settlement does not override thesestate laws.”

|

Mierzwinski and US PIRG are on record supporting the merchants' side in the litigation overcredit card interchange.

|

Complete your profile to continue reading and get FREE access to CUTimes.com, part of your ALM digital membership.

  • Critical CUTimes.com information including comprehensive product and service provider listings via the Marketplace Directory, CU Careers, resources from industry leaders, webcasts, and breaking news, analysis and more with our informative Newsletters.
  • Exclusive discounts on ALM and CU Times events.
  • Access to other award-winning ALM websites including Law.com and GlobeSt.com.
NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.