SALEM, Ore. - A $1.6 million single sponsor credit union has been forced to merge after its sole sponsor has ended its sponsorship of the CU. Orville Roth, the founder of the Roth's grocery store chain, helped found the now $1.6 million Roth's Employees FCU as an employee benefit in 1973. Just over 32 years later his son Michael, who runs the company now, withdrew the store's sponsorship and demanded the credit union vacate the space it occupied on the second floor of one of the chain's stores by Dec. 31. An article in the Statesman Journal quoted Michael Roth as blaming the credit union's small size and location for the CU falling out of favor. "It didn't have the critical mass to compete with the credit unions that are on every corner," the paper quoted him as saying. Roth's declined to take any questions about the credit union. The credit union has 948 members or just about 50% of the store chain's employees and was very popular with the employees according to Shirley Arends, the credit union's CEO for 14 years who said that her desire to retire had sparked a dispute with Roth's that wound up with the credit union losing its sponsorship. "I was manager here because I believe in the credit union and not because of the money," Arends said. "So when it got to be time I would like to move on it was hard to find someone else who would be willing to work for a comparable salary." The credit union's call report showed that the CU had two employees, one full-time and one part-time, and that the CU was paying out $58,000 in salary and benefits per year as of June 2005. The search for someone with an accounting background to take Arends' job led to some interest from a bookkeeper for the credit union and that, Arends said and Roth's confirmed for the Statesman, is when things got hot for the credit union. Unbeknownst to Arends, Roth's considered the credit union a vendor for the purposes of a policy which prevented vendors from offering employment to any Roth's employees. So when the credit union let the Roth's leadership know that it was considering the bookkeeper for the job, Arends said the grocery chain's leadership had become so highly angered it wouldn't back off its decision to end the relationship with the credit union, even when both the credit union and employee backed off the possible new hire. The credit union is being forced to merge, Arends said, because its limited assets prevent it from being able to get space outside of its sponsor's location. Members are scheduled to vote November 8 on the proposed merger with the $9.6 million IBEW/SJ FCU which has multiple SEGs. -dmorrison@cutimes.com
From the November-09, 2005 issue of Credit Union Times Magazine • Subscribe!
Single Sponsor CU Being Cut Loose by its Sponsor
Want the latest credit union news?
Sign up for our free newsletter today! All the breaking credit union news and information you need to make the right decision for your credit union delivered to your inbox. For free!
Thanks for subscribing, you will start receiving the Daily News Alert tomorrow!
Comments
Resource Center
View All »
A Path Chosen Prudently
In today's complicated credit card landscape, choosing the correct path between self-issuance or agent banking...
Winning the War on Cybercrime: The Four Keys to Holistic...
This white paper examines the importance of adapting to changes in fraud attacks without significant...
FFIEC Proposed Guidance on Social Media and How it Affects...
To learn how you and your institution can stay compliant with the new proposed FFIEC...
The Rise of "Mobile Commerce" and How it Affects YOU!
Could plastic cards become a thing of the past? This white paper explains what constitutes...
Key Indicators of High Performing Credit Unions
Get a complimentary demo of our loan portfolio analytics and access to the white paper,...










