Credit Union Times recently published my letter [Oct. 12, page 30] where I argued that interfering with any credit union’s internal governance is an ugly business and is not proper behavior for a trade association.
Chuck Bruen’s letter [Oct. 12, page 30] prompted by the announcement of Technology Credit Union’s intention to convert to a thrift charter, made a number of excellent points and should be thoughtfully considered by all credit union executives and trade groups.
If the roughly 73,000 members of Technology Credit Union, a $1.5 billion institution headquartered in San Jose, Calif., vote to convert to a mutual bank charter, they will likely find their increased expenses not restricted to taxes alone, according to CUNA Chief Economist Bill Hampel.
Members would lose access to network if conversion to bank goes through.
CUNA Chief Economist Bill Hampel says his analysis shows that Tech CU would pay more for FDIC coverage than now for NCUSIF.
Technology CU members will determine what they want in their CU's future; Bank of America has fiduciary duty to recoup interchange losses.
The board of directors of $1.5 billion Technology Credit Union has written the CU's 74,000 members that they may be better served by converting the credit union to a bank.
When Technology Credit Union posted its announcement that it was exploring a conversion to a mutual savings bank, CUNA and the California Credit Union League made some noise. CUNA CEO Bill Cheney said his organization feels credit unions are the best providers of service to consumers.
There would appear to be disproportionate anguish in some credit union circles about the recent announcement that Technology Credit Union is considering changing its charter to that of a mutual savings bank.
California Department of Financial Institution regulations are silent on credit union conversions to mutual savings banks.