How credit unions might be caught up in election-year politics.
The current political landscape sparks reader debate.
Experts discuss the future makeup of the NCUA board and what it means for credit unions.
Whether you’re a Democrat or Republican, the opposing party's leading candidate is dead set on taking away something you love.
I disagree strongly with the premise behind the article, “Does NCUA Disdain the Dual System?” (Aug. 8 issue, page 1). It’s important to set the record straight.
Credit union consultant, blogger and Capitol Hill veteran Marvin Umholtz said the nation’s growing political divide is apparent among credit union leaders and fuels comments he receives from his readers and colleagues.
Regarding the Editor’s Column [“Step Up and Put the Fear of CUs into Bankers” July 4 issue]. I wholeheartedly applaud Sarah Snell Cooke’s efforts to ignite a new passion for credit unions on the issue of member business lending.
The banking industry’s longstanding effort to deter or prevent credit unions from using the words “bank” and “banking” in advertising was advanced to a new plateau last week with a proposed cease and desist order placed by the state’s top regulator on the $600 million Vermont State Employees Credit Union.
The recent decision by the State of Vermont Department of Financial Regulation ordering the Vermont State Employees Credit Union to stop using words such as “bank” and “banking” in its marketing, communications and advertising begs the question, are you really serious?
Douglas Fecher, president/CEO of the $2.45 billion Wright-Patt Credit Union told lawmakers last week to direct the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to limit regulatory burden by using existing tools, such as the power to exempt credit unions from its rulemaking.