Quantcast
Go Search
 
GAO Comes Down Uncommitted on Card Interchange 
11/19/2009 

Neither card issuers like credit unions nor card acceptors such as merchants are liable to be terribly happy with the recent General Accounting Office Report on the credit card interchange.

 

The recent Credit Card Responsibility and Disclosure Act instructed the GAO to study the issue and report how credit card interchange has changed over time, how credit card competition has affected consumers, the benefits and costs to merchants in accepting cards and the potential impact on consumers of the various options to reduce the interchange costs to merchants.

 

Essentially the GAO found that none of the four different strategies for reducing the cost of card interchange to merchants would be ideal.

 

“If these measures were adopted here, merchants would benefit from lower interchange fees,” GAO wrote in a highlight of the report.  “Consumers would also benefit if merchants reduced prices for goods and services, but identifying such savings would be difficult. Consumers also might face higher card use costs if issuers raised other fees or interest rates to compensate for lost interchange fee income. Each of these options also presents challenges for implementation, such as determining at which rate to set, providing more information to consumers, or addressing the interests of both large and small issuers and merchants in bargaining efforts.”

Readers Comments

Name:
Email (will not be published):
Subject:
Comment:

    • 11/19/2009 4:14:15 PM
    • Brian J. Donovan
    • GAO Interchange Report
    • Senator Dick Durbin recently talked about how the U.S. banking industry 'owns' Washington. The GAO report on interchange fees proves Senator Durbin is correct. The average interchange fee in the U.S. is seven times the interchange fee set by Visa and MasterCard in countries throughout the rest of the world. Using 2008 figures, if the interchange fee charged by credit card issuers was decreased (via comprehensive credit card reform legislation) from the current 2.10% to 0.60%, the result would be an annual savings of approximately $34.3 billion for U.S. merchants and consumers. Credit card issuers could retain 0.3% as a processing fee, the remaining 0.3% could be a "tax" used to fund a Natural Disaster Trust Fund (NDTF). In 2008, this would have generated $6.86 billion in funding for a NDTF. Let's be clear. The interchange fee is a hidden tax, just not a tax subject to political control or for which there is any discernible social benefit. Decreasing, and imposing a transparent tax on, the interchange fee would have the same stimulus effect of a tax break, but without an impact on the federal budget. The following article discusses how comprehensive, standardized, simplified, and transparent credit card reform legislation may fund a Natural Disaster Trust Fund. http://www.csnews.com/csnews/images/pdf/creditcardreform.pdf